In observance of the Holy Week, the Philippine News Agency’s online news service will be off on March 29, Good Friday, and March 30, Black Saturday. Normal operations will resume on March 31, Easter Sunday.

— The Editors

Exclusive ISP deals for condos, subdivisions ‘unlawful’: solon

February 20, 2022, 1:53 pm

<p><em>(File photo)</em></p>

(File photo)

MANILA – Makati City Rep. Luis Campos Jr. has warned condominium and subdivision developers against forming exclusive deals with a sole internet service provider (ISP), saying they risk getting slapped administrative fines of up to PHP100 million.

“The law is very clear. These exclusionary arrangements with an in-house ISP are prohibited. They are unlawful barriers to the entry of competitors, or other ISPs,” Campos said in a news release on Sunday.

“We would urge residents or tenants adversely affected by their property developer’s exclusive contract with a single ISP to file complaints with the Enforcement Office of the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC),” he added.

Campos said the exclusive transactions “also constitute unfair business practices that deprive consumers of the freedom to choose their preferred ISP.”

“In fact, one could make the argument that in forcing the residents or tenants to subscribe to a lone pre-determined ISP, there is price-fixing, because the consumer is in effect being barred from obtaining a similar service at another price,” Campos pointed out.

Campos has been batting for increased competition in the telecommunications market and greater public access to fast internet networks.

He has been pushing for the passage of House Bill 7479, which seeks to tag high-speed internet as “a basic telecommunications service to which every Filipino enjoys a right of access.”

Under the bill, the National Telecommunications Commission would be empowered to require ISPs to deliver rising average connection speeds within prescribed deadlines.

“We must remind all entities, including property developers, that they are forbidden from engaging in any conduct that would prevent, restrict or lessen competition,” Campos said.

Under the Philippine Competition Law, Campos said entities that take advantage of their dominant position to obstruct competition could face a fine of up to PHP100 million, depending on the gravity and duration of the offense.

In 2019, a mass housing developer was forced to settle an “abuse of dominance” violation with the PCC.

The developer acknowledged its misconduct in imposing a single ISP for nine of its projects across the country and was compelled to pay a fine of PHP27.11 million.

Last year, the PCC’s Enforcement Office also filed a separate case against a condominium developer for a similar offense. (PR)

Comments